Jump to content

Stop drafting pitchers in the first round


Ori-Al

Recommended Posts

The Orioles should stop drafting pitchers in the first round. For whatever reason, they can't develop them, indeed, they seem to wind up getting injured. It's like the Ravens drafting wide receivers in the first round-it just doesn't work out. Stick to hitters in the first round, until somebody figures out what the problem is with our minor league pitching development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Maybe the key is to investigate the workload some of today's pitchers have racked up before they even reached high school.

I can't say I'm sold on the notion that "polished" college pitchers have always played for coaches who had the player's best interests at heart either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the key is to investigate the workload some of today's pitchers have racked up before they even reached high school.

I can't say I'm sold on the notion that "polished" college pitchers have always played for coaches who had the player's best interests at heart either.

That would be a flag for Bundy but not Harvey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My philosophy would be to stay away from pitching in the 1st round and away from HS pitchers in the first 2-3 rounds. You can point to HS success stories like Kershaw and Bumgarner but they seem to be the exception. Pitching is so risky on two sides, living up to the potential and staying away from career altering injuries. It just seems so volatile. We've seen that you can trade hitting for pitching and young hitting for young pitching. There are always exceptions but it just seems like a more sound philosophy to me.

The red flag is "a very young pitching arm".

The Orioles need to just give up trying to draft pitchers in the early rounds. I'm not saying we should totally abandon it, but the organization really needs to try something different. Call it bad luck, ineptitude, call it whatever you want, but it just has not worked, and hasn't for a long time. The Orioles track record developing position players is much better - let's stick to our strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles need to just give up trying to draft pitchers in the early rounds. I'm not saying we should totally abandon it, but the organization really needs to try something different. Call it bad luck, ineptitude, call it whatever you want, but it just has not worked, and hasn't for a long time. The Orioles track record developing position players is much better - let's stick to our strengths.

Despite all the flack he receives Matusz ended up with a pretty decent career given his draft position, Gausman is doing fine.

I think folks underestimate the bust possibilities of position players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitchers for other teams never get hurt.

This team either can't evaluate pitching talent, develop it or both. Either way, they've been much better drafting position player talent in the first round over the years (Markakis, Wieters, Machado). I don't know why they have drafted so many more pitchers than position players over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite all the flack he receives Matusz ended up with a pretty decent career given his draft position, Gausman is doing fine.

I think folks underestimate the bust possibilities of position players.

If Matusz is the first name you point to as an example of the organizations ability to develop pitching, then that says it all. Guasman has promise, but the jury is still very much out on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite all the flack he receives Matusz ended up with a pretty decent career given his draft position, Gausman is doing fine.

I think folks underestimate the bust possibilities of position players.

Tim Beckham is now considered a draft success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...